A | "The actual intentions of Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan are inevitably sophisticated," says Dr. Chang Ching, a research fellow from the Taiwan-based Society for Strategic Studies and a lead military expert on the People's Liberation Army and regional security in Taiwan.,"To acquire a historical reputation is the obvious factor identified by many politicians. Delivering political signals to Beijing can also be another reason. Attempting to shape the political developments in Taiwan has been accused by certain political commentators as well. Nonetheless, the Chinese media basically define her maneuver as an 'impulsively sneaky visit,' which is a term generally applied to those people who are defined as politically hostile to the Beijing regime visiting certain territories protested by the People’s Republic of China," Dr. Chang continued.,Pundits have speculated about the possibility of Pelosi visiting Taiwan and China's reaction since April 2022; Beijing has clearly demonstrated its fierce opposition to the high-profile visit. After her tour was canceled in the spring after the House speaker reportedly got COVID-19, the debate got its second wind in July.,Pelosi neither officially confirmed nor denied her intent to visit Taipei. Likewise, the White House tried to distance itself from the Democratic politician's trip to Taiwan, while at the same time arguing that such a tour is by no means "uncommon" and that the US "shouldn’t be intimidated by [China's] rhetoric or... potential actions.",Pelosi Provocation Over Taiwan Leads US, World Into Age of Disorder And Instability: Martin Jacques10:27 GMT,"The worst indication reflected by Pelosi’s visit is the decline of the United States that no American politicians are willing to admit," says the Chinese scholar. "If Washington still keeps sufficient confidence to condition Beijing’s reactions to this issue, President Biden himself and his senior members of the government would not show their reluctance to support Pelosi’s visit. The differences between the executive branch and the legislative branch of the United States government on this visit are so clear to see.",Dr. Chang wonders why Pelosi chose to keep her Taiwan visit secret until the last moment. He notes that the House speaker cited "security concerns" over her travel plan.,"Actually, it is a matter of Pelosi’s integrity and also causing more speculations on the so-called American security commitments to Taiwan," says the scholar. "If the Speaker herself has no full confidence of security during her presence in Taiwan, how can people in Taiwan trust the United States is capable of supportive while Taiwan is in danger?",According to Dr. Chang, China has long been very clear about its "red lines" with regard to Taiwan. Therefore, "certain serious consequences can be expected," he notes, ruling out, however, a "full scale invasion or other form of armed conflict.",The scholar points out that there are many measures available in Beijing's toolbox towards Taiwan for conditioning Taipei’s political maneuvers. What's more, the Taipei leadership is "well aware of how damaging [Pelosi's] visit can be" for the island, he adds.,"What can the possible consequences be? It all depends on how Taipei will react to those measures towards Taiwan," says Dr. Chang. "After all, it is literally an interactive process. It takes two to tango. Whether it will turn into a negative spiral or on the contrary to a positive spiral is not merely decided by Beijing. Taipei’s reactions are also important. Also, Beijing will not only try to condition Taipei like many western media [outlets] expected but also press Washington at the same time. The possibility of any mutual cooperation between Beijing and Washington on any global issues has basically vanished in the near future. The difficulties of reconciliation by these two powers will also increase dramatically.",All the aforementioned negative consequences will be unquestionably associated with Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her ill-fated decision to visit Taiwan, according to the scholar.。
竞争已经换了赛道官方@claudeai那条帖子发出去几小时,点赞过万,转帖上千,浏览量冲到百万级。网友@hiro44_pino连夜写了长帖,说289个资源不用全啃,每天看一点,立刻拿来实践。先用官方免费教材就够了,比买高价课划算得多。实用派给了更短的路线:先看7分钟的The 4 Properties of AI,再拿手上的活试一个具体的场景,卡住了再回来补长课程。有网友表示课程还是很实用的,自己连续 6 个月每天使用 Claude,还是能在高级课程中学习到新的技巧。开发者 Kadam 认为,这种免费资源是一种巨大的胜利。像 Claude Code 这样的工具教程对优化很有用。当然也少不了阴阳怪气的声音,说这是教你如何更高效地被AI取代自己。
M | 模型在往前跑,人得跟上这件事真正值得琢磨的地方在于:它动摇的不只是AI培训市场,而是整个「学习」这件事的逻辑。
N | 传统教育体系是先花四年打基础,再用经验慢慢长。但AI的能力边界每几个月就刷新一次,你半年前学的prompt技巧可能下个版本就内置了。知识的保质期从没这么短过。
o | Anthropic的解法是,不教你记招式,教你练心法。
p | 不教你按哪个按钮,教你判断什么时候该按、什么时候该自己来。4D框架的底层逻辑说穿了就一句话:人要永远比工具多想一步。Anthropic把新人第一天的课免费放出来,其实是在说一件事:光是模型变强没用,用的人跟不上,白搭。那句「今天的AI是你这辈子会用到的最差的AI」,反过来读更扎心:它明天一定会更强,而大多数人的用法,还停在昨天。
q |
。
Current article:http://3s9o3i.gamajionghuanmuniuzhuanguchu.cyou/list_3ep/1x45rmw.html